I think we need to be very careful and not make rash decisions. Leadership is not jumping to conclusions, but it is thoughtful deliberation based on knowing, not intuition.

I am also very concerned with the fact that everyone is shouting as if they are all Populists now. All of the sudden it is the blame game in a humungous scale.

We need to be cautious not paranoid. Courageous not foolhardy.

I didn’t actually add much to his original article, but I wanted to rephrase the idea in my own words because it explained a lot of my experiences with male/female sexuality. Not all of them, for certain, but it might be one of the larger-scale influences.

The study I was reading about didn’t give any information on the homosexual tendencies of the offspring of gay males, but I’m not sure how accurate such studies would be; a closeted gay man would be very strongly motivated to seek a woman who wasn’t really into sex. Amusingly enough, if the “androphilia gene” theory is true, that would mean he would most likely end up with a woman who wasn’t a carrier, and therefore any offspring they might have wouldn’t be any more susceptible than the general population. Potentially.

Nature seems to agree with conservatism on one thing though: namely that homosexuals need not procreate. Ironic, then, that conservatism provides pressure for homosexuals to have “normal” lives, marry, and have children. (This is not an argument on the right to procreate, but on the hardwiring that produces or does not produce offspring through sexual attraction, and the societal imperative to procreate regardless.) Do you have information on homosexual tendencies of male offpsring of closeted homosexuals?

cheers, Salinity